Tag: Cross-Border
-
Enforcing Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments In Singapore
Enforcing Foreign Interlocutory Judgments or Injunctive Relief In Singapore
-
Re-Domicile to Restructure – “Good Forum Shopping” ?
As of 11 October 2017, foreign companies meeting the relevant criteria may “re-domicile” in Singapore, effectively becoming Singapore companies. This is in line with the amendments to the Companies Act made earlier in March this year. Apart from the consequences of re-domiciliation highlighted in the Business Times article available here, it is also likely that…
-
![Invoking The Inherent Jurisdiction Of The Singapore Court In Aid Of Foreign Restructuring Proceedings [Insolvency Law] [Cross-Border Jurisprudence]](https://alexanderpang.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/24059622850_4970d50818_k.jpg?w=1024)
Invoking The Inherent Jurisdiction Of The Singapore Court In Aid Of Foreign Restructuring Proceedings [Insolvency Law] [Cross-Border Jurisprudence]
*Case Commentary: Re Taisoo Suk (as foreign representative of Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd) [2016] SGHC 195 In the unreported decision of Re Taisoo Suk (as foreign representative of Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd) [2016] SGHC 195 (released on 13 September 2016), the Singapore High Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to stay all claims and proceedings against…
-
![Developments in Singapore’s Cross Border Insolvency Jurisprudence [Insolvency Law] [Cross-Border Jurisprudence]](https://alexanderpang.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/33149222263_33d842e11f_k.jpg?w=1024)
Developments in Singapore’s Cross Border Insolvency Jurisprudence [Insolvency Law] [Cross-Border Jurisprudence]
*This article was co-written by Mr Thio Shen Yi, S.C. and I, and published as a Firm client update in July 2016. Case Commentary: Re Opti-Medix Ltd (in liquidation) and anor matter [2016] SGHC 108 (“Re Opti-Medix”) The recent unreported Singapore High Court decision in Re Opti-Medix Ltd (in liquidation) and anor matter [2016] SGHC…
Singapore Legal Developments & Case Commentaries 